Knowledge architecture
Docs, help center pages, CRM notes, and approved support playbooks become one searchable knowledge layer.
Private AI support
A private support assistant that cites the source, escalates uncertainty, and turns repeated questions into product insight.
Docs, help center pages, CRM notes, and approved support playbooks become one searchable knowledge layer.
The bot knows when to stop and route to support, sales, success, or product ops.
Questions, confidence, deflection, and escalation themes feed product and RevOps decisions.
Docs, help center pages, CRM notes, and approved support playbooks become one searchable knowledge layer.
The bot knows when to stop and route to support, sales, success, or product ops.
Questions, confidence, deflection, and escalation themes feed product and RevOps decisions.
The first design decision is not the model. It is the source set. We define which help articles, product docs, policy pages, release notes, and customer-specific records the bot may use. Each answer can cite the source, and unsupported questions move to a person instead of producing a polished guess.
We also separate public knowledge from account data. A visitor asking about pricing should not trigger the same retrieval path as a logged-in customer asking about a workspace. Permissions, tenant isolation, and identity checks are part of the workflow design.
Escalation rules look at confidence, topic, account value, sentiment, and the action requested. A billing dispute, cancellation request, security concern, or enterprise implementation question should reach the correct team with the conversation summary and source links attached.
The handoff needs an owner and a timer. A bot that says someone will reply but creates no task is a dead end. We connect the escalation to the support queue, CRM, or Slack channel and record whether the human resolved the issue.
The pilot covers one knowledge collection, one audience, and a defined set of supported intents. It includes retrieval, citations, a fallback message, escalation, basic analytics, and an approval process for content updates. We test ambiguous questions, outdated pages, conflicting sources, and requests outside the bot's scope.
The interface is designed around confidence rather than theatrical typing effects. Users see the answer, the source, and the next option. Support sees the unresolved question and the context needed to take over. The wider AI agent service covers action-taking workflows beyond support.
We track answer acceptance, escalation rate, unresolved topics, source gaps, repeat questions, support handling time, and the percentage of answers that include a valid citation. Deflection is useful only when the customer actually gets the right answer.
Those questions create a product feedback loop. Repeated confusion can point to weak documentation, onboarding friction, or a missing product control. That is why the bot belongs inside the RevOps and customer-success system rather than sitting alone as a website widget. Bring one support workflow and we will scope the smallest useful version.
Before handoff, the support team receives the source inventory, permissions map, supported-intent list, fallback copy, escalation matrix, test questions, analytics definitions, and content-update process. The bot should remain maintainable when documentation or product behavior changes.
We test the experience on desktop and mobile, with keyboard navigation and clear focus states. Response speed matters, but so do readable citations, predictable escalation, and an interface that never traps a user inside the bot when a person is needed.
The launch plan begins with a limited audience or traffic share when possible. Early questions are reviewed for missing sources, weak escalation, and misunderstood intent before the bot receives broader responsibility.
Most automation projects start by asking which tool to connect. Zyphh starts with the operating workflow, the decision it should shorten, and the revenue, margin, hours, or cycle-time number the system has to improve.
The result is not a pile of hidden workflows. It is a system your team can inspect, operate, improve, and trust.
Yes. Source links and confidence thresholds are core to the implementation.
No. It removes repetitive answers and gives humans cleaner escalations.
Bring the workflow, the tools, and the metric leadership already cares about. We will map the safest first build.